
Readers Respond
NurseWeek
readers from across the country share their thoughts on
articles that inspired them and issues that moved them.
E-mail
us at editor@nurseweek.com.
Please use the name of the article you are responding to as
the subject of your e-mail. Unless otherwise noted, all letters
may be edited and published.
Please
include your full name, hometown and state, and healthcare
credentials. Brief and articulate messages are more likely
to be published.
September
4, 2000
Opportunity
knocks
As
a proud Canadian, the choice to move to the United States
from Canada was not easy . After graduating in 1996 from a
BSN program, I like many of my peers began the
hunt for a full-time job. What I faced were endless letters
stating there were no full-time positions, that the institutions
did not higher new grads, and to reapply once I had experience.
How are you supposed to get experience when no one will hire
you?
The
job search in Canada stretched coast to coast. After six unsuccessful
months, I was frustrated and angry, and began to think I had
wasted four years studying for something I could not make
a living doing. Being a new grad, I also had student loans
looming.
I
had always heard that there were jobs in the United States
for nurses. The thought of leaving my family and friends was
horrible, but I had to start my career and make a life for
myself. In November 1996, I wrote the NCLEX and began the
job search in Texas. By the end of December, I had more job
offers than I had in six months, plus I had the choice to
work in a specialty unit, something that never would happen
in Canada. I made the toughest decision that month, to leave
everything and everyone I knew and loved. I hopped on a plane
with two hockey bags of clothes and set off to the unknown.
It
has been almost four years since I moved. Never once have
I regretted my decision. Although I miss friends and family
every day, and I don’t get to see them more than once or twice
a year, personal survival and professional experience are
what keep me from crossing back over.
There
is word these days that the job market is opening up in Canada.
Frankly, I am wary. There may be jobs now, but what about
in six or eight months? What happens when a new government
takes over and cuts health care again? Where does that leave
all the nurses who moved home? Regretting their decision to
leave the United States.
Sure,
every one of us who left Canada miss it sometimes, but the
educational and professional opportunities in the United States
far outweigh what we would face if we moved back.
Christine
McCabe, RN, BSN
Corpus Christi, Texas
Younger
screenings
I
appreciate your CE
offering on colorectal cancer. Last year, we lost our
12-year-old son, Ben, to colon cancer. He was diagnosed in
a duke’s stage c and, despite surgical resection, chemo and
radiation therapy, colon cancer took his life after a nine-month
fight.
I
find it disturbing to see so many articles stressing screenings
for people ages 50 and up. Little is ever said about the increasingly
younger people diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Working in
an OR, I know this is true.
To
my knowledge, Ben’s case is rare. Will this always be so?
What can we, as health care professionals, do to prevent more
children and young adults from being overlooked for screenings?
Becky
Tucker, RN
Conroe, Texas
In
a pig’s eye
The
evidence to be "gleaned" from Sandra Hanneman’s
pig research ("High
on the Hog") is an unnecessary and sad regression
of medical studies and blind denial of the uselessness of
animal experimentation. No predictors of failure of
ventilatory
weaning has been discovered in 25 years of human research
on circadian rhythm, biorhythms and chronobiology? I find
that hard to believe.
A
few of the more obvious causes of failure:
-
Fatigue!
The patient must have that nightly bath.
-
Fatigue!
5 a.m. chest X-rays and blood draws.
-
Lights!
How many of us normally sleep with fluorescent lighting?
-
Noise!
There is an entire staff of personnel outside the doors
or, worse, curtains talking, laughing, etc.
-
Illness!
It disrupts circadian rhythms.
-
Physicians!
We base ventilatory weaning and extubation on the schedule
and convenience of physicians’ performing rounds and
not the condition of the patient. That is not going
to change.
In
25 years, we have refused to address the the simplest issues
of light, noise and fatigue. Further evidence has shown that
the use of animals for research, experimentation and surgical
practice to be without science, value or ethics. Some of the
top U.S. medical schools have stopped the cruel practice of
researching human medicine with animals. The University of
Texas Medical and Nursing programs should ban the use of animal
research and get on "the cutting edge of medicine"
by computerization and other advancements.
The
research being conducted by Hanneman is, in a word, hogwash.
Michael
D. Riffle, RN
Austin, Texas
Rude
interruption
When
I was living in California, I was reported to the Board of
Nursing without my knowing about it. I found out when I received
a letter from the board saying that the allegation about me
had been investigated and the board found that I had acted
in the best interest of the patient.
I
was working at Patton State Hospital and had to draw blood
for cardiac enzymes on a patient with a history of IV drug
abuse. He told me that he had only one vein left and that
the nurses on the medical unit allowed him to stick himself
for blood draws. After attempting twice to find the vein and
being unsuccessful, I allowed him to stick the vein. I went
on to finish the blood draw myself.
Because
I didn’t feel that I had done anything wrong, I charted exactly
what I had done. I was fired for my actions, but successfully
fought the discharge and was reinstated. No one mentioned
reporting me to the Board of Nursing and I didn’t think about
the possibility until I received the letter.
Of
course, having been fired left me with a bad taste in my mouth
for Patton State Hospital and I left a month after being reinstated.
It was after I was working at my new job for about a month
that I received the letter.
Phyllis
J. Ellena, RN, MSN, CNS
San Antonio, Texas
Fair
is fair
"Crossing
the Line" left the reader with the impression that
hospitals are almost daring nurses to go on strike; "Go
ahead, go on strike. We’ll just hire someone to replace you."
Nurses may as well give up any notion of standing up for better
working conditions, compensation, reasonable patient loads
and of all the nerve respect.
If
anything, the article should galvanize those nurses who want
just and proper working conditions, compensation, etc. How
can hospital administrators look nurses in the eye and say
that "the money just isn’t there" to hire more staff,
increase pay, or provide better benefits, but when push comes
to shove, hospitals find thousands upon thousands if
not millions of dollars to hire replacements? These
replacements should be ashamed of themselves. We are all in
this together. We need to start thinking less like nurses
and more like business people whenever we go job hunting.
I don’t know of a single nurse who has negotiated her salary
or any other "perks" at the time of hire. Basically,
it’s "Here’s what we’ll pay you. Take it or leave it."
And, being nurses and not business-savvy, we humbly accept
as though we are thankful to have any job. Hospitals are looking
for someone to provide a service and we should be able to
sell those services to the highest bidder.
A
recent study conducted by Vanderbit University shows that
for every seven nurses who leave the nursing profession, only
three nurses enter it. Also, that same study states that the
majority of nurses are over the age of 40. It doesn’t take
a genius to see that we are in dire need of nurses now and
the outlook is dismal. There were times when I was the only
American nurse on the floor because hospitals were, and still
are, recruiting outside of the country. Doesn’t that tell
you something?
If
ever there was a time to unionize, now is it. We keep hearing
of the "booming economy" and rising income, but
who’s income? Certainly not ours. At the same time that hospitals
are laying off nurses and other hospital personnel, hospital
CEOs are getting paid salaries in the hundreds of thousands
of dollars along with company cars and who knows what else.
We "expendable, dime-a-dozen nurses" can only dream
of having saved over thirty to forty years of working what
these CEOs make in a little under two years. Let’s not forget
that if these CEOs get "relieved of their duties,"
they won’t get two weeks severance pay; they’ll get the "golden
parachute" something you I will never see.
Staffing
is dangerously inadequate, putting the nurse’s license on
the line not just on a daily basis but on an hourly basis.
More importantly, it puts the patients’ health and well-being
at risk. Pay is pathetically low, benefits are mediocre at
best, and respect for the profession is virtually nonexistent.
We need to stand our ground and demand that we be compensated
fairly and have our demands met.
Fernando
Frescas, LVN
San Antonio, Texas
Take
the initiative
I
am responding to a reader who said there are no CME requirements
in Arizona. Washington has none, either. When I was practicing
in California, I had CME requirements that assured I at least
did something educational in my profession. Washington just
wants a fee every year. No CME. Doesn't matter if I graduated
in 1972! As you know, nursing changes almost monthly. What
we did even two years ago is different than today. I feel
for those who do not take the initiative to continue their
education. Too bad it's more than just Arizona with the problem
Sherrie
Shafer RN, BSN, CEN
Bremerton, Wash.
It’s
about rights
Carla
Cope unfortunately has missed the boat ("Readers
Respond"). So the CNA nurses were unprofessional
and the U.S. Nursing Corp. was. This is not the issue. The
issue is about using scab labor, which diminishes the strength
of the union and the individual nurse’s ability to voice her
opinion in the arena of collective bargaining. It is about
your rights as a nurse to get good benefits, good pay and
respect within the institution you work. So some nurses were
unprofessional from CAN. This may have been an isolated incidence
and does not reflect the CNA union as a whole. Those of you
nurses who think you’re doing the right thing by speaking
highly of scab nurses are not doing yourself any favors, believe
me.
Randy
Claxton, RN, MS, NNP
Phoenix
Nursing’s
plight
I'm
a Canadian graduate nurse and left Winnipeg, Manitoba, almost
two years ago because of the job market in Canada. Yes, there
is a nursing shortage in Canada, but no one is willing to
hire full time. Colleagues who've remained have been hired
on as part-time, but work full-time hours.
The
CNA also decided to delete the two-year college diploma program.
This in itself has contributed to nursing’s plight. I since
have learned that they were considering revoking that policy.
Students can more afford a two-year college program vs. a
four-year university program.
Maria
Whitehead, RN
Farmington, N.M.
Unsung
heroes
Nancy
Devine's article "Arctic
Commute" (July/August) brought back fond memories
of my own experience working with the Community Health Aide/Practitioner
Program in the Bristol Bay region of Alaska. Most readers
would not recognize the job title "health aide"
mentioned in the article. These people are truly the backbone
of health care in most remote Alaskan villages. They are generally
village residents, therefore intimately acquainted with the
people they serve. They provide primary and emergency health
care to their family, friends and neighbors within the microscope
of village life. If the phones are in working order, they
consult with their referral physician. If not, they have to
rely on their good sense and a few weeks of training. If the
weather is bad, they may provide 24-hour acute care for days
at a time, with limited resources, until the weather clears
enough for their patient to be flown out to the hospital,
and it is not uncommon for patients to require ongoing emergency
care while en route.
Public
health nurses and other itinerant health care professionals
in Alaska have played an important role in reducing the incidence
of preventable illnesses. However, when the itinerant nurses,
doctors, dentists, et al., finish their visit, it is the health
aide who continues the work at the tundra level.
My
nursing hat goes off to the often unsung heroes and heroines
of Alaska's "bush" health care. They gave me a renewed
understanding of what the "care" in health care
really means.
Marilyn
Ludden, RN
Glenns Ferry, Idaho
Enough
is enough
I
read "Crossing
the Line" in the July/August issue and found it troubling,
but also typical. It's another example of unprofessional behavior
by nurses that keeps us from attaining professional status.
The scab nurses should be ashamed of themselves. Personally,
I am so disgusted with the profession and its failure to organize
that I have decided to abandon it altogether. Nurses are not
professionals never have been and never will be. That
is a fact. We are nothing more than hourly wage earners with
a job instead of a career. There is no such thing as a nursing
career unless you have an advanced degree. At any rate, unions
are not necessarily the answer, but at this time they are
all we have. Too bad nurses are too stupid to know what's
good for them. The American Hospital Association is the enemy
and until nurses take a militant approach instead of pussyfooting
around (nurses are wimps), we will never get anywhere. Good
luck to them, but I'm outta here.
Tommy
Startzman, RN
Las Vegas
Rodeo
atrocity
As
a practicing Colorado RN, I want to say I was ashamed to see
the rodeo
piece in the July/August NurseWeek. Why is a nursing
publication giving implicit approval of the so-called sport
of rodeo in which blatant abuse of animals is a regular part
of the program? Aren't nurses supposed to have compassion?
Why should that not extend to the nonhuman animals who are
forced to take part in this spectacle and who are humiliated,
cruelly manipulated into being aggressive by the use of electric
prods and other torturous devices for the casual entertainment
of humans? How about making a list of the injuries they suffer,
such as broken necks, spines, legs; punctured lungs; extensive
bruising, hemorrhaging; and death.
The
cowboys have a choice; unfortunate creatures do not. I find
no sympathy for their [cowboys’] injuries.
It
is time to rethink some aspects of western culture, such as
this, that teaches our children it is acceptable to brutalize
other creatures. This is one of the many factors in our society
that desensitizes our children to violence. As George Bernard
Shaw so aptly stated: "Custom will reconcile people to any
atrocity."
Nurses
need to get up to speed on social justice issues and NurseWeek’s
article certainly doesn't advance that.
Judith
Cunningham, RN
Boulder, Colo.
Striking
out
Thank
you for the article on organized nursing and the outside agencies
that get hired to work for the striking nurses. I can't complain
about the nurses because they need the work, but isn't it
interesting that the hospitals cry poverty every time it's
time for job shifting, reduction in staff, or plain old-fashioned
hospital closing, but the minute staffs talk about organizing
or they do strike, the hospital finds lots of money available
to pay these outside agencies to work rather than pay their
people
what
they are worth to keep their staffs in place. Instead of striking,
may I suggest keeping people on the job and organizing pickets
outside the entrance? Hospitals can't stand bad publicity
and if the nurses stay on the job and picket during days off
or off duty before coming to work, the fear of patient abandonment
is gone. The hospital still has to explain why there are
pickets
outside their property and the nurses get to take care of
their patients. A well-done article.
Paul
Seale, RN
Tucson, Ariz.
Fair
is fair
I
agree that most nurses are more inclined to tell you that
they are not in the field of nursing because of the money.
I agree that most nurses are truly concerned about the well-being
of their patients and the quality of care they receive. I
don't believe that this survey in San Angelo is reflective
of the truth and how nurses feel about money. I think the
problem is that nurses are so used to being paid diddly for
the amount of responsibility they incur they have gotten used
to doing more for less money. It is a shame that a BSN nurse
out of school makes anywhere from $13 to $17 an hour. A graduate
from a four-year program in computer design, software engineer,
etc., can make $60,000 to $90,000 a year and nobody dies when
they make a mistake. So are nurses really happy? The strike
in California is an indicator that we are not. I don't care
what anyone says, money is important. Nurses have families
to feed and bills to pay. I have been in nursing for 14 years;
in the last six years, I have not noticed a significant increase
in nurses’ salaries compared to other workforces’. The bottom
line is we have an important job that incurs the highest level
of responsibility to ourselves and our patients. There is
nothing wrong with wanting to be paid a fair salary for the
work we do.
Randy
Claxton, MS, RN, NNP
Phoenix
Pro-active
results
After
reading "Crossing
the Line" in the July/August issue, I felt the need
to comment. I have been a registered nurse since 1969, graduating
from Good Samaritan Hospital School of Nursing in Phoenix.
I have never been in favor of nurses joining unions, but at
this time in my career and life, I have began to wonder if
this is the right decision. Nurses need to unite across the
country as well as in Arizona. At our hospital, the discontent
has become so noticeable that myself and several other employees
polled the hospital and found out that our concerns were universal.
We then wrote a "pro-action statement plan" and
submitted it to our vice president of patient services. We
made no demands except to be treated with respect and that
communication be open between staff and administration. This
was a joint effort between our department, including RNs,
ORTs, housekeeping, Central Services, etc. We submitted this
statement and plan a couple of weeks ago, and have already
started to see some results that we find encouraging. We discussed
salaries, benefits and everything in between. We would like
to form a "pro-active committee" throughout all
departments. This committee would meet to discuss problems,
concerns of every department in the hospital. We could have
done this without the administration, but we are hoping that
they will encourage this forum. So, maybe a union is not needed
if nurses and hospital workers unite in a pro-active manner.
Jack
R. Taggart, RN, CNOR
Cottonwood, Ariz.
Letters
From Last Week
|