Click here to return to the NurseWeek.com Homepage   Nurse.com Version 2.0
 
 
Search Site
Select Year:
Search Term:
 
Job Search

Nursing Careers

Career Fairs

Facility & Agency Profiles

Resume Builder

Career Advice

Resources

Salary Wizard

Spotlight On

Career Assessment
Tool


 


Education/CE Marketplace

Unlimited CE

Event Guide

CE Direct

Nursing Schools

Resources

NCLEX Information

 


Weekly Features

Archives

In the News Today

Dear Donna

Nursing Shortage

Up Front

5 Minutes With

NurseWeek/AONE Survey

 
 
Video Health Library

Flu Report

Pollen Report

Nursing Calculators
 





   

 

Uncharted Waters
(continued)

Page 3

 

Continued from Page 2


Hospitals that are out of compliance also can self-report and, as of Jan. 21, 86 reports were received from hospitals that weren’t complying with the ratios in some patient care units. One report involved a dispute over the interpretation of the roles of RNs and LVNs and the DHS decided the hospital was in compliance, Brooks said.

“Anytime a new law takes effect, there’s a transition period when clarification is needed,” Brooks said. “For nearly 28 years, we’ve had nurse-to-patient ratios in intensive care units. What’s different is that ratios are now specified in the law for other hospital units.”

CNA reports better staffing under new ratio law

OAKLAND, Calif.—One month after mandatory nurse staffing ratios took effect at California hospitals, the California Nurses Association reported that 68 percent of the surveyed hospitals had improved their staffing conditions as of Feb. 4. About 59 percent of hospitals were generally in compliance with the requirements of the law, the CNA added.

The survey covered 111 hospitals, or nearly 30 percent of the general acute care hospitals in California, from mid- to late January. The results were based on interviews with registered nurses in the hospitals, said the CNA, which sponsored the mandatory nurse staffing ratio law.

The law, which is the first nurse staffing ratio law in the nation, took effect Jan. 1.

The CNA announced plans Jan. 13 to survey RNs on every unit in hospitals across the state to measure compliance with the new law.

The announcement came on the heels of a California Hospital Association statement that called the suspension of acute care services at Santa Teresita Hospital in Duarte a “tragic consequence of California’s unrealistic and unachievable nurse-to-patient ratio regulations.”

The CHA filed a lawsuit Dec. 30 in Sacramento County Superior Court, just two days before the new law went into effect.

~Rebecca Ray

Jean Ann Seago, Ph.D., RN, a researcher on nursing issues and associate professor in the UCSF department of community health systems, said many hospitals are looking for creative ways to comply with the nurse staffing mandate. “One director of nursing created units of 12 patients attended by two RNs and an LVN to take care of covering for lunches and breaks. It’s a solution that makes sense, meets the ratio and assures continuity of care.”

The California Healthcare Association, a hospital trade group, has filed a lawsuit, which is pending, challenging the section of the law that requires nurses to be relieved by “competent” and qualified caretakers during breaks, lunch and short absences.

“My own feeling is that ratios are not going to solve all the patient care problems, but it’s certainly a step in the right direction,” Seago said.

Nursing organizations themselves are split on the ratio issue, and the American Nurses Association, while working for adequate staffing levels for patient safety, opposes ratios because of the inflexibility nurses have once legislation takes effect.

Michelle Campbell, MSN, RN, president of the Pennsylvania State Nurses Association, an ANA affiliate, said once mandates are set, they’re difficult to change and could result in loss of access to care in some regions.

“Unfortunately, the nurses aren’t available to meet these ratios,” Campbell said. “I think a lot of providers would hire more nurses if they could.”

The California Nurses Association, which sponsored the ratio law in California, split with the ANA several years ago over the issue and is a founding member of the American Association of Registered Nurses, which advocates for ratio laws. The AARN has 80,000 members in California, Massachusetts, Maine, Pennsylvania, St. Louis and southern Arizona.

Regardless of their differences, nursing organizations are united behind research from the University of Pennsylvania and elsewhere that shows that higher levels of nurse staffing result in improved patient outcomes, including mortality.

Linda Aiken, Ph.D., RN, a leading researcher on the nursing shortage at Penn, found that patients scheduled for routine surgery were 31 percent more likely to die in a hospital with a patient-to-nurse ratio of 8-to-1 than in a hospital with a ratio of 4-to-1. The study was published last year in The Journal of the American Medical Association.

Also, a Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations report said low numbers for nursing staffs were a factor in 19 percent of medical errors resulting in deaths or serious injuries in hospitals. Nurses’ inadequate orientation and training were cited as factors in 58 percent of serious errors.

“The rationale for ratios is an important thing for people to know,” UCSF’s Dracup said. “Clearly, research shows outcomes related to patient safety, morbidity and mortality are related to the number of nurses per patient and the education of the nurses.”

Contact John Leighty at johnsan@aol.com.