Click here to return to the NurseWeek.com Homepage   Nurse.com Version 2.0
 
 
Search Site
Select Year:
Search Term:
 
Job Search

Nursing Careers

Career Fairs

Facility & Agency Profiles

Resume Builder

Career Advice

Resources

Salary Wizard

Spotlight On

Career Assessment
Tool


 


Education/CE Marketplace

Unlimited CE

Event Guide

CE Direct

Nursing Schools

Resources

NCLEX Information

 


Weekly Features

Archives

In the News Today

Dear Donna

Nursing Shortage

Up Front

5 Minutes With

NurseWeek/AONE Survey

 
 
Video Health Library

Flu Report

Pollen Report

Nursing Calculators
 





   

 

Jolly Good
(continued)

Page 3

 

Continued from Page 2

A top-down system also means uniformity for nurses across the United Kingdom. For example, the 2002 salary for every registered nurse with no special license in the United Kingdom was the equivalent of $27,266, except for those working in London, who earn extra money for living in one of the world's most expensive cities.

In the United States, the 2001 average salary of a nurse in Jackson, Miss., was $40,360 and the average salary of a nurse in Los Angeles was $55,860.

Yankee influence

The British system may be moving toward an American model. Clark cites the phrase, "When America sneezes, Britain catches cold," she added, "and the incubation time is getting shorter."

Although private care is not comprehensive in the United Kingdom, it offers certain elective surgeries and most long-term care. At present, about 100,000 nurses work outside the NHS, most in nursing homes that are subsidized but not run by the state.

"Many thought they were moving into an area where they could provide better quality care," Clark said. And, in the beginning, things were better.

"They were never paid better, but the environment was better and they tended to have more autonomy," she said. But long-term care is subsidized at a cost lower than actual price. Consequently, working conditions for nurses have declined.

American Magnet hospitals also have caught the attention of British policy-makers, said Sue Machell, MBA, RN, a registered midwife and registered health visitor. Like Yaseen, Machell visited the United States to observe American nursing practices as part of her job as a fellow in education and leadership development. Some NHS entities may be allowed to entice good nurses with extra incentives.

"In the United States, people probably wouldn't be too bothered about that," she said. "Here, people would be incensed. Socialized medicine is kind of stamped through us like a piece of rock."

Nevertheless, Machell has seen a lot of American ideas work in Britain. When she worked on the floor, colleagues consistently looked across the Atlantic for new ideas.

For her part, Siviter likes aspects of both the American and the British systems, although she said the changes in education, pay and responsibilities make the United Kingdom an exciting place to work right now.

"Nursing here is not the same as America, but it's good," she said. "I wouldn't be an RN today if it wasn't for British nursing."

Contact Heather World at H_world@yahoo.com