|
Continued from Page 1
The acceptance of NPs in the workplace has not been
wholehearted, however. There has been some resistance
to increasing the responsibilities of NPs in regard
to prescription and reimbursement privileges. According
to the Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family
Practice and Primary Care in Washington, 50 physician
organizations recently submitted a petition to the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services asking for stricter
compliance in the billing numbers and payments assigned
to NPs and an audit.
The American Medical Association guidelines specific
to an integrated physician-NP practice state that the
responsibilities of NPs must stay within the scope of
his or her professional license, and that the physician
is responsible for overseeing all patient care. It endorses
"the appropriate input of the nurse practitioner"
to ensure the quality of care.
The guidelines also state that the NP's participation
is contingent upon the acuity of the patient's condition,
and that a physician should be available at all times.
Also, the NP's role "should be defined through
mutually agreed-upon written practice protocols, job
descriptions, and written contracts," and that
the patient should be informed if they are being treated
by an NP.
The AMA addresses the need for "a professional
and courteous relationship" between the physician
and the NP, with "respect for each other's contribution
to patient care."
The interest in such a collaborative relationship between
doctors and nurses has fluctuated in recent years. A
renewed interest in collaboration was sparked by a study
conducted by the Congressional Office of Technology
Assessment in 1986, according to Health Care Business
Digest. The study showed that 60 percent to 80 percent
of all basic care provided by doctors could be performed
by nurses, thus lowering the cost of health care coverage.
This study caught the eye of insurance companies, not
to mention President Clinton, who included increased
roles for nonphysician providers (NPs and PAs) in his
proposal for national health care coverage. Although
his proposal failed, the topic of doctor-nurse collaboration
programs did not fall by the
wayside.
The 1998 budget bill signed by Clinton allowed APNs
to receive direct Medicare reimbursements in all areas
of the country, not only rural areas, according to Health
Care Business Digest, further encouraging the use of
nurses in physician practices.
Studies determining the effectiveness of doctor-nurse
collaboration programs have come about in the past 10
years.
Several studies conducted throughout the 1990s showed
that using nurse practitioners and other nonphysician
health care professionals resulted in an increase in
income in private practices, fewer hospitalizations
among the elderly at a senior center and a lower number
of cesarean sections, according to Health Care Business
Digest.
In its position statement on cost-effectiveness, the
American Academy of Nurse Practitioners conducted a
review of studies determining the benefits of doctor-nurse
collaborations.
It refers to a study published in HMO Practice in 1994,
in which adding a nurse practitioner to a practice doubled
the number of patients typically seen by the physician,
which translated to an increase in revenue of $1.65
million for every 100,000 HMO members per year.
Another study published that year in HMO Practice showed
that the use of an MD-NP team in a long-term care facility
lowered not only costs, but also the number of emergency
room transfers, length of hospital stays and specialty
visits for patients covered by the MD-NP teams.
"The long-standing cost benefits of nursing-specific
interventions in a managed care environment are substantial,"
the AANP wrote in its position statement. "It has
been argued that employing nurse practitioners fully
could save 20 percent of the cost of primary care."
More recently, two studies published last year assessing
the results of doctor-nurse collaboration programs made
suggestions for an increase in the number of programs
throughout the world.
|