
Courtesy
of University of Michigan
Health
System
|
|
| |
More
NurseWeek Features |
|
|
Smoke-Free Zone |
|
| |
Nurses and patients tackle nicotine addiction
|
|
 |
Bloodless Survival |
|
| |
Surgical techniques to use when transfusion drops out of the equation |
|
|
|
| Paula
Marentay, RN, of the University of Michigan Health
System in Ann Arbor met her new robotic colleague
last year, one year after the Food and Drug Administration
approved the da Vinci Surgical System as the first
robotic system to be used in American operating
rooms. |
The patient on the operating room table is about to
undergo delicate surgery for a kidney transplant. Instead
of performing the surgery at the patient's side, her
doctor is positioned at a console several feet away.
As he makes a tiny incision in the patient, he views
the procedure through a high-resolution system that
provides 3-D images of the surgical field. Slowly, he
manipulates the instruments to remove the patient's
kidney.
Nurses, medical assistants and a second surgeon stand
next to the patient, but the doctor performs the entire
surgery by operating the arms of the 7-foot robot. Although
this may seem like a scene from a science fiction movie,
computerized technology such as robotic surgery as well
as bar coding systems to deliver medication are a reality
in many hospitals.
And nurses are among the hospital workers who are on
the frontlines using these cutting-edge inventions,
which ultimately have the potential to improve patient
care, reduce errors and even save lives.
The da Vinci Surgical System, manufactured by California-based
Intuitive Surgical, is the latest advancement in minimally
invasive surgery. The robot allows doctors to zero in
on the surgical site and work on a smaller visual scale
than ever before.
The robot's tiny camera, equipped with multiple lenses,
allows the surgeon to magnify an area up to 12 times
that of normal vision. The remote-controlled instruments,
which the surgeon inserts in the patient through small
incisions, also allow access to hard-to-reach areas.
Paula Marentay, RN, of the University of Michigan Health
System in Ann Arbor met her new robotic colleague last
year, one year after the Food and Drug Administration
approved the da Vinci as the first robotic system to
be used in American operating rooms.
Marentay's work with the da Vinci starts behind the
scenes before the surgery begins.
She prepares three robotic components: the console
where the surgeon sits, the video and medical monitors
and the robot's arms. She covers the equipment with
sterile drapes and ensures that the robot's mechanisms
are in working order before the patient enters the operating
room.
"The da Vinci seemed so complicated that I thought
it was something we would try but rarely use,"
Marentay said. "Instead, it's become very much
in demand at our hospital."
Sharon Krhoun, RN, of Mt. Diablo Medical Center in
Concord, Calif., has assisted with minimally invasive
surgery for the past eight years, and has worked with
the da Vinci robot since July.
"I think it's exciting to see our patients benefit
from advances in robotic surgery," Krhoun said.
"They are thrilled to find out that we have new
surgical procedures that offer less pain and a faster
recovery time."
For nurses working in postop, robotic surgery means
seeing patients with less scarring and fewer infections.
Many patients who previously would have spent weeks
in the hospital now are discharged in a matter of days.
Despite the benefits of robotic surgery, medical experts
don't anticipate seeing this new technology in every
operating room. Patients, not physicians, are pushing
for widespread use of robotic surgery. Many physicians
prefer to conduct surgery using the traditional methods.
In addition, the da Vinci's $1 million price tag may
prohibit many hospitals from investing in the robotic
technology.
Prescription accuracy
While some hospitals are experimenting with robotic
surgery, others are tapping into the latest computerized
technologies with high-tech prescription delivery systems.
Nurses who use this new technology begin by scanning
three things: a bar code imprinted on the patient's
ID, their own ID and the prescription. These three codes
must match to verify the drug, dose, time and route.
Hospital medication errors received national attention
in November 1999 when the Institute of Medicine reported
that thousands of deaths occur in hospitals as a result
of medical errors.
At Southwest Washington Medical Center in Vancouver,
Wash., nurses use a new medication delivery system called
AcuScan-Rx.
"This technology reminds me of when videocassette
recorders were introduced," said R.J. Melton, an
RN at Southwest Washington. "The original monitors
were black-and-white and much larger in size. Our newer
models transmit in color and are half the size of the
original devices."
Each month, the medical center prepares an average
of 300,000 doses of medication. Systems such as AcuScan-Rx
have proved to reduce medication errors by more than
80 percent by catching potential errors before they
occur, according to a study published in the winter
edition of the Journal of Healthcare Information Management.
"The system can be more time-consuming to use,
but the advantage is the added layer of security it
offers to both patients and nurses," Melton said.
In August, California's Sutter Health network of hospitals
announced plans to implement the new Bridge MedPoint
medication delivery system in all of their medical centers
within the next three years. Bridge MedPoint, manufactured
by California-based Bridge Medical Inc., is similar
to the AcuScan system.
"From a nurse's perspective, I think this is one
of the most exciting new technologies to be introduced
in recent years," said Susan Bumatay, MSN, RN,
assistant administrator and chief nurse executive at
Sutter Delta Medical Center in Antioch, Calif., one
of the first six Sutter Health hospitals to implement
the technology.
Sutter is among many California hospitals working to
comply with the new California Health and Safety Code
that requires medical facilities to implement a medication
safety plan by Jan. 1, 2005.
The MedPoint system is positioned at the bedside and
provides nurses with medication- specific alerts and
drug administration guidelines to help prevent errors
and improve clinical decision-making. MedPoint is designed
to prevent errors by sounding an alarm if an improper
medication or dosage is given to a patient. The error
is also automatically registered in the patient's chart.
"The task of routinely administering medication
has become much more complex in recent years,"
Bumatay said. "There are more than 17,000 pharmaceuticals
in use in the United States today, and many of them
have names that look and sound alike, which can be confusing."
Costly implementation
Despite the advantages of bar coding, some experts
said implementing a system such as MedPoint can be costly
and many hospitals cannot afford the software, hardware
and training associated with such a system.
"We need to keep in mind that systems such as
Bridge MedPoint are software, and as great as they are,
they don't fix underlying problems in the institution,"
said Cherie Galusha, MSN, RN, a nurse at Sacred Heart
Medical Center in Spokane, Wash. "Attention has
to be given to retooling existing processes from care
models to medication distribution."
Pharmaceutical companies also could play a role in
reducing medication errors, she said.
"At this point in time, pharmaceutical companies
don't bar code all of their unit dose products and hospital
pharmacies are having to make up the difference,"
Galusha said.
The solution at Sacred Heart has been to bring in an
outside vendor to bar code the inventory that doesn't
already come wrapped in codes. This requires the hospital
to repackage or wrap over existing packaging, which
adds another expense to the hospital's implementation
budget.
"The Bridge MedPoint system is great," Galusha
said. "But it's important for nurses not to become
so reliant on the system that they give up their own
critical-thinking skills."
Contact Linda Childers at eastbaypr@aol.com
Next Page
|