Four years
into her career as an Army nurse, Michelle Renaud, Ph.D., a critical
care RN, left her commission and hired on at a hospital in Columbia,
S.C., to explore civilian nursing. A year later, she was back
in the Army, relieved to return to a world where her word carried
more weight and health care seemed to make a lot more sense.
"I was
frustrated by the lack of collegiality and respect between doctors
and nurses," the neonatal nurse said.
"I had
no ability to ask questions or to make a decision of my own in
relation to the care of an infant. Things I was used to doing
on my own, I wasn’t allowed to do. I had to call the physician
for everything."
Renaud is
just one of many former military nurses who have found that the
same job can be vastly different in the armed forces and the civilian
sector.
Uncle Sam
extracts a toll on military nurses, including long hours, physical-fitness
exams and the uncertainty of not knowing if next year you’ll be
stationed in Kansas or Hawaii.
But the uniformed
life, nurses say, offers handsome compensation, postings around
the world and a degree of freedom and equality that might surprise
their civilian counterparts.
Renaud, who
retired from the Army as a full colonel, remembers many occasions
when she outranked the physicians with whom she worked.
That, along
with the sense of camaraderie common to the Army, tended to negate
the unequal footing between physicians and nurses more typical
of civilian hospitals. With that equality came the freedom to
do what needed to be done for the patient.
"I appreciate
the ability to think for myself in the military," said Renaud,
who now works as an assistant professor of nursing at Pacific
Lutheran University in Tacoma, Wash. "There wasn’t an issue
of who’s ordering who or that sort of thing. It’s more [a question
of ] who has the most experience."
The Navy has
3,097 active-duty nurses, Navy spokeswoman Jan Davis said. The
Air Force has 3,890, according to Lt. Col. Vanessa Wise, MSN,
RN, an Air Force recruiting chief, while the Army has 3,400, according
to Col. Carol Reineck, Ph.D., RN, chief nurse of the Army medical
command. The armed services have little difficulty filling these
officer-level positions, finding ready replacements among enlisted
medical personnel and recently graduated nursing students.
Nurses also
have risen through the ranks in the armed services to the top
of their fields. Maj. Gen. Nancy Adams, commander of Tripler Army
Medical Center in Honolulu, is a nurse, as is Rear Adm. Kathleen
Martin, commander of the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda,
Md.
It’s a far
different story for the armed services’ civilian nurses, who can
make up 50 percent of the nursing staff at major military hospitals.
"We’re
seeing the same aging of the civilian nurses as in the civilian
sector," said Reineck, who added that most civilian Army
nurses are in their mid-40s.
"We’re
facing a lot of [civilian] retirements in the next few years,
and we’re concerned about that."
The Army,
Reineck said, is working to relax some hiring standards in order
to bring in more nurses.
While the
starting salary for a nurse usually is better in the civilian
sector, the military compensation package begins to outstrip civilian
pay by the third year of service, nurses said.
Some benefits
are hidden: The nurses receive a housing allowance and a food
allowance in addition to their salaries, and part of their income
is exempt from taxes. All nurses interviewed for this story said
their pay decreased when they left active service.
Tim Bushey,
MSN, RN, a nurse who left the Army three years ago, estimates
that his new job as a clinical researcher at the Medical Center
of Central Georgia pays as much as his previous job, but the reduction
in other benefits equals $10,000 to $12,000 less. It’s only his
pension that keeps him and his family afloat, Bushey said.
What does
it mean when the nurse outranks the physician, or the patient
outranks the nurse? Less than civilians might think. Nurses reflected
that their health care colleagues seemed less attached to the
pecking order than other branches of the military, or even their
civilian counterparts.
"I think
in the military there’s more of a team and a partnership,"
said Patti Page, MSN, RN, an Army nurse who went on to work as
a civilian nurse and community college instructor in North Florida.
"You’re
on more of an equal status. I don’t think that you see that in
all civilian hospitals."
But rank can
come in handy in a pinch. "In the military when you have
a rank you can go through channels to resolve problems and there
are ways to get that done. In the civilian sector, it’s less clear."
Still, some
find the lack of structure and discipline in the civilian setting
a little unsettling.
"I’m
very rigid. I’m ‘yes’ or ‘no,’ " said Sgt. Martin Yamzon,
RN, an independent-duty medic for the Air Force who moonlights
on weekends as an emergency room nurse at Sutter Davis Hospital
in Davis, Calif. At Sutter Davis, Yamzon noted, "You can’t
tell your patients, ‘Suck it up.’ "
Is work more
exciting in the military than in a normal hospital? "That’s
a roger," Yamzon said.
Military nurses
work with a wide variety of people in many kinds of medical facilities.
In a 15- to
20-year career, it’s not uncommon to have six or more major postings,
including ones abroad. Many nurses spend a stint in Germany or
Korea. For Yamzon, who accompanied U.S. troops to Haiti and Korea,
these postings were among the most exciting times of his life.
"You’re
a walking hospital," said Yamzon, who treated Bangladeshis,
Pakistanis and Jordanians who were part of the multinational force
in Croatia. "You make all these decisions. As a [civilian]
nurse, there are certain protocols you have to adhere to and it’s
frustrating."
While military
nurses must be self-reliant, they also often have more manpower
to get the job done than in the civilian sector.
"I’m
familiar with just about every piece of equipment, every drug,
every medical situation," said Susan Lewsen, who was an Army
nurse for 12 years, worked as a private nurse in home health and
now runs Utah’s state nursing registry. "That’s why I felt
so confident in home health. You’re thrown out in the field with
minimal equipment and you just have to make do."
Back in the
hospital, however, she missed the lack of help from orderlies.
"In the civilian world, you’re pushing pills, you’re doing
everything, and there’s just no support."
But in the
civilian sector, at least you know where you’ll be in a few years—an
attractive enticement for people like Bushey, who ended a 15-year
military career when his oldest son reached high school. He knew
that after that, he didn’t want to move again.
Now, he works
standard eight-hour days as a researcher and doesn’t miss the
60- to 70-hour weeks he put in as he performed his regular nursing
duties, served on compulsory committees and boards and prepped
for his physical-fitness exams, which included a 2-mile run and
a certain number of push-ups and sit-ups every six months.
According
to the Navy, the top reasons listed by nurses in their exit interviews
were the permanent change-of-station moves every two to three
years and the difficulty of maintaining a career for a nonactive-duty
spouse.
All former
military nurses said their service gave them a sense of flexibility
and open-mindedness that they believe they would have been unable
to acquire otherwise.
"When
I hear [civilian] young people complain because of schedules or
their patient load or whatever, it gives me a perspective that
those problems aren’t particular to one system, and there are
proactive ways of dealing with them that aren’t complaining,"Page
said.
"When
I was in the military, I learned a variety of ways of doing things.
There’s more than one way of accomplishing a goal."