Most
nurses can recall difficult, even obnoxious patients they’ve dealt
with but the ones Sandra Hanneman , Ph.D., RN, FAAN, had to take
care of every day in her ICU were absolute pigs.
Sus
domesticus, to be precise, the sort of farm-raised 150- to 200-pound
porker generally consumed as ham or bacon on breakfast tables. But
these animals, which usually spend most of their lives eating and
rooting on a farm in Bastrop wound up at the University of Texas-Houston
Health Science Center School of Nursing as human research subjects:
sedated, hooked up to ventilator machines, IVs and monitors, and
sprawled on their backs on regular ICU beds.
They
even had names: Mikey, Opus, Claude Jean and Juan Gabriel (six other
pigs were studied, but did not get the ICU treatment). But the cute
monikers shouldn’t be taken as a sign of sentimental attachment,
said Hanneman, associate dean for research and evaluation and associate
professor of acute and continuing care.
"I
don’t like pigs, I don’t like working with them. I’m a city girl,"
Hanneman, 52, admitted. "I don’t like the smell. But in many
ways they’re the closest thing to people that we can get for this
project. And we do acknowledge each pig’s individual personality;
we pay as much close attention to them as we would to human ICU
patients."
The
meticulous monitoring and care, Hanneman said, may eventually unlock
a mystery she has been investigating as a scholar since 1990, but
has wondered about since her days as an ICU nurse: Why does one
out of five ICU patients on a mechanical ventilator experience trouble
being weaned from it, despite no medical signs of a problem?
"We’ve
made no progress in 25 years in predicting who will have trouble
coming off the ventilating machine, even though lots of people have
been researching this area," she said. "It seemed clear
to me in reading the broader literature that we were missing some
basic phenomenon."
Hanneman
theorizes that the common model of medical care, based on homeostasis the
concept that bodily functions seek to maintain a constant, steady
state throughout the day and night has blinded caregivers to the
body’s natural rhythms, which vary and play an important role in
determining the effectiveness of a given therapy or drug.
Chronobiology,
more widely known as the study of "biorhythms," emphasizes
the body’s "peaks and troughs" during a roughly 24-hour
cycle and might aid ICU workers in identifying windows of opportunity
to start weaning patients off ventilators or administering drugs
for maximum effect, Hanneman said.
"Circadian
rhythms are the most well-known of the body’s variables, but depending
on the time of day, hormones also get secreted, blood pressure goes
up and down, body temperature changes, and this is all affected
by seasonal changes, the weather, the earth’s rotation,"she
said. "If we can individualize our care to the point that we
understand a particular person’s peaks and troughs, we may be able
to predict with much better accuracy the optimal time to administer
a therapy."
But
although most physicians accept the basic premise of a biological
clock, Hanneman said, the medical community has been slow to apply
its broader implications, preferring the homeostasis model despite
its drawbacks. Her study may help change such thinking, but not
before she and her team go through reams of data reflecting more
than 35 cardiopulmonary and metabolic variables for each pig.
"We’re
still working out techniques to measure and glean all this information,
and reconciling it with journals we kept on the subjects. This is
a very expensive study, about $35,000 per pig. We need to gather
lots of data and then find ways to extract the intrinsic from the
extrinsic information and establish the biological patterns accurately,"she
said.
"I’m
not entirely convinced myself, but if this chronobiology theory
holds water, it could significantly change the way we handle ICU
patients. We would be more interested in finding patients’ marker
rhythms as soon as they came in and identifying windows of adaptation.
We may find that we were taking some patients off ventilators at
the wrong time of day; the homeostatic indicators were right, but
we caught them at a trough of some kind, and so they crashed.
"Instead
of giving patients a steady drip all day long, we may need to vary
the amount of medicine depending on the time of day or their blood
pressure. Maybe we’ll discover that we shouldn’t feed intravenously
at all, but turn to more episodic approaches. The changes in care
could be comprehensive."
They
already have been for the pigs.
|