|
Washington
(H24N).
In the latest issue of Psychological Bulletin, published
by the American Psychological Association, a review of the literature
on sex differences of physical aggression in heterosexual partners
found some startling results.
Contrary to
popular belief, women were slightly more likely than men to use
one or more types of physical aggression and to commit such acts
more frequently. However, men were more likely to inflict an injury,
and overall, 62 percent of those injured by a partner were women.
Another discrepancy
was also found between those studies where women used self-reports
compared to partner reports. Noted in an excerpt by John Archer,
the author of the study, "According to self-reports, women
are more likely than men to commit acts of physical aggression,
whereas according to partner reports [filled out by partners and
compared to counterparts’ reports] their respective levels are similar,
although this is attributable to outliers [findings that are outside
the bell curve, those that don’t seem to make sense because they
are on the extreme ends]."
Archer illustrates
a crucial point in research: how the data are collected is just
as important as the results garnered. Different methods of measurement
may produce conflicting results.
The study also
points out the two conflicting viewpoints about partner violence.
The first viewpoint is dubbed "family conflict," and data
supporting this position are usually derived by asking participants
not selected for their high level of violence, but more in terms
of how they resolve relationship conflicts. This perspective typically
emphasizes influences on aggressive behavior that are common to
both men and women.
The second viewpoint,
the "feminist position" is largely derived from female
victims’ reports. The theoretical underpinnings of the feminist
view are very different. The "feminist position" regards
partner violence as a consequence of patriarchy, and thus it largely
involves male perpetrators.
The meta-analysis
in this current study analyzed 82 studies in six countries. The
majority (72) of the studies were conducted in the United States.
Studies from Canada, the United Kingdom, Korea, Israel and New Zealand
were also analyzed. Archer does acknowledge that one of the limitations
of this study is that many of the studies reviewed have come from
culturally similar western nations, and thus generalizations of
the conclusions would be inappropriate for other cultural nations.
|