|
New
York. The editor of the New England Journal of Medicine
accused the pharmaceutical industry of hiding behind a cloak of
"exaggerated or misleading" claims to justify high drug
prices and shirking its duty to the public in its drive for huge
profits in an editorial June 22.
Responding
to a drug company’s claim that price controls would squelch innovation
and deprive Americans of new cures and better treatments, Marcia
Angell argued that many of the new drugs that companies produce
"add little to the therapeutic armamentarium except expense
and confusion."
Angell
expressed concern that the congressional debate over a Medicare
prescription drug benefit has largely focused on who will pay and
the breadth of coverage, instead of the price of the drugs themselves.
Medicare
beneficiaries who lack supplemental insurance pay twice as much,
on average, for the 10 most commonly prescribed drugs compared to
favored customers, including large HMOs and the Veterans Affairs
system, the editorial stated.
Alan
Holmer, president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America, which represents drug companies, issued a prepared statement
criticizing Angell’s point of view as "a complete distortion
of the facts."
|