|
San
Francisco.
In a case involving an AIDS patient whose insurance policy went
into effect in 1988 despite his HIV status, the California Supreme
Court reaffirmed June 26 that insurance companies may not deny benefits
for pre-existing conditions more than two years after the purchase
of a policy.
Mark Galanty,
a court reporter from Studio City, had been diagnosed with HIV in
1987; the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company nonetheless approved
his application the following year. When he applied for disability
benefits in 1994 due to symptoms of full-blown AIDS, the company
initially obliged but revoked coverage one year later citing a pre-existing
condition.
The court, overturning
two previous decisions, ruled that action illegal since insurance
policies’ "incontestability clause" provides a two-year
limit for challenging benefits. Galanty had consistently paid all
premiums for five years before his disability claim. Only in proven
cases of misrepresentation and fraud could an insurance provider
refuse payment, the court decided.
"It was
as if the insurance company did a bait and switch," said Jon
Davidson, a Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund attorney who
served as co-counsel. "People bought this policy, thinking
they were protected, and then when the condition set in, the insurer
said, ‘No, you’re not protected for that.’ "
As a result
of this and other recent rulings, as well as technological breakthroughs
such as gene mapping, insurance companies are designing less "consumer-friendly"
policies, said Frank Darras, a Claremont disability claims lawyer.
"They’re
putting into these new policies 12-month chronic fatigue clauses
and 12-month mental illness clauses, during which time they can
revoke benefits, precisely because the techniques for predicting
whether someone will come down with a condition are much better,"
Darras said. "That’s why those with the older insurance policies
from the ‘70s, ‘80s and ‘90s need to hold on to them."
Paul Revere
agreed to pay Galanty more than $100,00 in denied benefits. Under
California law, insurance companies cannot ask a prospective policyholder’s
HIV status, but can require an HIV test.
|