Against the Odds
American natives endure increased health risks and diminished care


What do you think?
Email us at
editor@
nurseweek.com
 
 

Related stories in this issue:

Vision of Health
A new prescription for the nation’s well-being

Closing the Gap
Program aims to add more minorities to healthcare professions

For more information

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Bureau of Health Professions Division of Nursing

HRSA Bureau of Health Professions

National Student Nurses’ Association

National Black Nurses Association

 

By Nancy Devine
March 13, 2000
Photo: Photodisc

Approximately 2 million American Indians and Alaskan Natives (AIs/ANs) are spread across the nation in 500 tribes, highly concentrated in some states and nearly absent from others. Their primary care is provided by the federal government through the Indian Health Service (IHS), which has 12 service areas and two hospitals. The levels of health care provided for this population—1 percent of the nation—vary wildly, but have one thing in common: lack of funding. And AIs/ANs who face numerous health risks also have one thing in common: Their standard of health is precipitously below the national average.

Federally recognized tribes are sovereign—each is considered a nation, not subject to state regulation—and the federal government has signed treaties to provide health care in exchange for land. These arrangements include many pieces of legislation, and are clouded with complex guidelines and broken promises. Although the historical narrative is dense and perplexing, the reality is that American-Indian health care requires intervention.

"In spite of all the medical breakthroughs in the later part of this century, we still see significant health disparities for minorities, including Native Americans and Alaskan Natives," said U.S. Surgeon General David Satcher during the launch of Healthy People 2010. "I will be working with Native-American and Alaskan-Native communities so that everyone can reap the benefits of improved health."

HP2010 aims to eliminate disparities through an increase in community-based programs that are culturally and linguistically appropriate, an increase in minority health professional graduates, and improved data gathering to better understand health disparities and service needs. The initiative originated in 1979 to forecast what could be achieved through preventive interventions. The two main goals of HP 2010 are increased quality and years of life, and elimination of health disparities among different segments of the population. "The underlying premise of Healthy People 2010 is that the health of the individual is inseparable from the health of the larger community," Satcher said.

Limited progress

The objectives of Healthy People 2010 follow those of Healthy People 2000 and previous decade-long goals set by the surgeon general. Progress report data on 31 HP 2000 sub-objectives for the AI/AN population indicate that 17 are progressing toward the year 2000 targets. In 1992, the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use among AIs/ANs dropped to 7.3 percent, surpassing the year 2000 target of 10 percent. Motor vehicle crash deaths dropped from the 1987 baseline of 37.7 per 100,000 to 32 per 100,000 in 1992 and met the year 2000 target. Unintentional injury deaths and suicide also declined, but remain at levels higher than the total population.

Nine objectives, or 18 percent, went in the wrong direction with increases in: overweight prevalence, 48 percent for AIs/ANs, 29 percent for total population in 1993; diabetes prevalence, 70 per 1,000 for AIs/ANs, 30 per 1,000 for total population; and cirrhosis deaths, 21.6 per 100,000 for AIs/ANs, 8 per 100,000 for total population. In addition to these health concerns, other large disparities for AIs/ANs in such areas as women’s health, alcoholism and substance abuse, family violence, and maternal and child health are targeted in Healthy People 2010.


Funding uncertainty

The question of funding HP 2010 goals and existing IHS programs remains central to the solution of such large-scale health problems.

"Healthy People 2010 is a framework, not a piece of legislation, designed to be used by states and communities to document their needs and as an agenda for action," said Deborah Maiese, senior prevention policy adviser, Healthy People team leader, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. "We have seen the Cherokees and other tribes do their own Healthy People [programs] and encourage it."

Other healthcare experts who have studied AI/AN health issues offer different perspectives. "IHS has been underfunded for many, many years," said Louise Kiger, MN, RN, past director of the division of nursing of Indian Health Services. "It can be from 40 to 60 percent funded for the level of need. The funding is discretionary, depending on the whims of the congressional leaders and their understanding and sensitivity toward Native-American health issues." Kiger, a Pueblo Indian, has seen improvements during her 40 years of nursing, including the process of self-determination where tribal entities seek funds directly from IHS to run their own health programs. "When I left [IHS], more than 40 percent of the Indian tribes were running their own healthcare programs. The only problem with that is the overall funding isn’t enough."

From 1992 to 1998, IHS did not receive appreciable increases, yet had to absorb $650 million in costs, including inflation. In 1999 and 2000, President Clinton supported the largest increase of about 7.5 percent, or $230 million, according to Craig Vanderwagen, MD, director of clinical and preventive services for the IHS. "We recently compared IHS funding on a per capita basis with the medical insurance of a federal employee, and we are funded at 60 percent of what that package buys. I believe the major threats to AI/AN health are poverty, job opportunity, and education. When you trace back what it takes to prevent substance abuse, chronic lifestyle diseases like diabetes and heart disease, one has to address the economic future of young Indians."

Bob Schacht, PhD, the task force coordinator for "Emerging Disabilities: American Indian Issues," a detailed report of AI/AN health issues by the American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Northern Arizona University, sees interrelated problems. "These are very different communities with varying needs, and IHS funding is way short of what’s needed for all the programs," said Schacht, who also is a research associate at the center. "Between the two clusters of health problems—one related to alcohol, the second related to diabetes, and the consequences of the combination—there’s virtually a national epidemic in Indian populations, all affected by poverty-related issues. One place we could start helping would be to live up to our treaty obligations."

The past president of the National Alaska Native American Indian Nurse Association sees leadership needs as essential to addressing the disparities in health care. "IHS funding is bare bones, but medicine costs real dollars and there’s no way around getting the right antibiotic or surgery," said Bette Keltner, PhD, RN, dean of the Georgetown University School of Nursing. "The people who decide what program will be funded and how it will be implemented are the people who shape very powerfully what healthcare delivery will look like, and we need Indian people at all of those levels for equivalent representation."

Despite the scope of the current situation for American Indians, Vanderwagen, who began his career as an LPN, believes nurses serve as front-line catalysts for change. "Our facilities are staffed by trained nurses, many Indian women, who provide continuity of care for community members," Vanderwagen said. "They provide cultural relevancy, and are the first and last contact with patients. They serve as learning mentors for the community, including new physicians. For these important reasons, nurses will be critical to the successful implementation of new programs. They are the mainstay, working to help natives transform their health status."