|
As we approach the end of the year, there is always
a sense of trying to tie up loose ends so that we can
start the new year fresh. It is also a time to evaluate
the past 12 months to see what we have accomplished
(or not). Here are a few highlights and lowlights of
2002:
We began the year full of hope as the Nursing Reinvestment
Act had just wound its way through the reconciliation
process and was headed for the president's desk. The
act was not funded, however, and funding efforts came
to a screeching halt after the November elections changed
the Senate majority and both houses of Congress went
on early vacations.
Many local, state and national efforts, including the
work of Nurses for a Healthier Tomorrow and Johnson
& Johnson, significantly increased interest in nursing
among young people as well as people seeking a second-career
option. A new problem arose when the number of qualified
applicants to nursing programs in many parts of the
country exceeded the number of student slots available.
Fortunately, we saw numerous instances of hospitals
and businesses that were willing to collaborate with
nursing schools to allow more students to enroll either
through funding faculty positions or contributing their
own staff who could assume some faculty duties. This
is clearly not the long-term answer, but it was a much-appreciated
jump start to solving the problem. In the coming year,
we need to address not only funding additional faculty
positions, but also increasing faculty pay.
Nursing salaries rose and retention began to take
precedence over-or at least have equal status with-recruitment.
Organizations began to look more closely at how to invest
in the nurses they have and thereby increase the satisfaction
of both nurses and patients. Magnet hospital concepts,
once embraced by only a few, became the goal of many,
and research showing what we all know in our hearts
and minds-that more registered nurses caring for patients
means better patient care-found its way into mainstream
health care and the public media.
As for NURSEWEEK, we continued to publish for more
than 1 million nurses, expanded and improved our Web
site, launched a weekly e-mail news update, increased
our continuing education offerings, completed a national
study on the career intentions of nurses and their views
on work environment, began a project to follow a group
of new graduates through their first year of practice
to learn what facilitates and hinders entry into our
profession and honored nearly 200 nurses at our Nursing
Excellence Awards events.
Finally, in a heartwarming end to the year, the annual
Gallup Poll survey on honesty and ethics in professions
conducted Nov. 22-24 found nurses back on top when the
public was asked to rate the honesty and ethical standards
of people in a number of professions. (Last year we
dropped to second, behind firefighters, but had been
first the previous two years.) Seventy-nine percent
of respondents rated the honesty and ethical standards
of nurses as very high or high (22 percent very high,
57 percent high). The next highest rated professions
were pharmacists (67 percent), military officers (65
percent), grade and high schoolteachers (64 percent)
and medical doctors (63 percent).
We made many gains this year, but there is much work
left. The latest Gallup Poll results are a good foundation
for our efforts in 2003.
Discuss this and other topics with your colleagues
at www.nurseweek.com/rnvillage
|