A League of Their Own
Med/surg nurses deserve recognition as a specialty
By Carol Bradley, MSN, RN,
California Editor
September 10, 2001
When you turn around
and look back at the many changes in health care in the last two decades,
I suspect it is the med/surg nurse who can tell you, in the most dramatic
terms, how they have affected the care of patients for the good,
as well as for the bad.
While no one in nursing
has escaped the earthshaking changes that DRGs, managed care and patient
care restructuring have wrought, the epicenter clearly occurred within
the med/surg units of our inpatient hospitals. That is where the greatest
changes in length of stay, patient acuity and technology rapidly transformed
the care of patients. Unfortunately, it is also where the cost-focused
"redesign" consultants aimed their guns most often.
These sweeping changes
in care (both good and bad) are also what made med/surg nurses specialists
in their own right. Increasingly, med/surg care has become subspecialized
and tailored to meet the needs of specific patient populations. Regardless
of care setting, many of these patients have lifelong chronic diseases
that will be managed by an experienced, specialized med/surg nurse. As
more care has moved into the community, it is the nurses with strong med/surg
backgrounds who are in demand and worth their weight in gold.
Most hospital nursing
leaders agree that it is the med/surg nurse who has the toughest job today.
This is the area where the most diverse knowledge and skill expectations
exist, where the pace of care has accelerated beyond what anyone expected
and where a relentless workload allows for little or no pause. Amazingly,
this is the environment that the majority of our new graduates first experience.
It is also where the pressures for improving quality and service tend
to be emphasized, yet needed infrastructure and resources can be lacking.
When it comes to
historical hospital capital investments, we all know that resources far
more often have been directed toward the specialist and his/her new high-tech
toy than for basic IV poles, wheelchairs, electric beds or computerized
documentation for a med/surg unit. In my assessment, a demonstrated commitment
of resources for nursing care in these areas has been a good indicator
of a hospital's real priorities. Physician colleagues have confirmed that
they, too, can measure a hospital by the quality of the nursing care on
the general medical and surgical units.
I predict that our
med/surg colleagues are in for some long overdue positive attention. As
everyone rushes to address the issues of work environment, staff retention,
staffing resources, patient workload and support infrastructure, it is
certain that med/surg nursing will be central to the ultimate solutions.
Savvy employers already are turning their attention (and resources) to
their med/surg nurses and patient care environment as the keys to larger
organizational issues and challenges.
For example, med/surg
is clearly where the core issues around the staffing debate (aka staffing
ratios) need to be focused. All you have to do is look at the diverse
med/surg staffing ratios reported by California hospitals.
While I am not a
proponent of staffing ratios, it is a sorely misinformed person who would
suggest that the care requirements of healthy postpartum moms justify
a staffing ratio that exceeds that for complex and unstable med/surg patients.
It has never been a truer statement that if you can work med/surg, you
can handle anything. Yes, there is reason that some specialty nurses resist
floating to med/surg.
Perhaps the greatest
recognition in the nursing profession in the last decade is that med/surg
nursing and its many varied subcomponents are deservedly true specialties
in their own right.