|
The moves to
outcomes management and evidence-based practice are beginning to
provide data to discover clinical answers and to support things
that many nurses have known intuitively for a long time. At the
same time, research on the nursing profession and the quantitative
value of the profession often has lagged behind. Such research is
important because we belong to a scientific profession that practices
in health care businesses.
In the same
way that we rely on clinical research to direct our patient care
efforts, the people who are in charge of administering our practice
sites must rely on data to tell them what they should do. This is
especially true as we face a shortage of RNs. Without valid data
to support the need for RNs specifically, other solutions will be
proposed that replace RNs with other workers.
Nurses who began
their practices before the mid-1970s remember when what are today
the professions of respiratory care, cardiology, occupational therapy,
physical therapy, etc., were then the job of nursing.
It is
interesting to note that the specialties that once were part of
nursing seem to be all the things that could be charged for as ancillary
services while nursing services generally remained part of the daily
room rate.
The good news
is that several recently released studies quantify what is going
on in the nursing profession and what nurses directly affect in
terms of care outcomes and cost. While the results of the studies
do not always paint a positive picture, the data is important.
The National
Sample Survey of Registered Nurses 2000, conducted every four years,
shows more RNs, an aging workforce, flat earnings and an almost
doubling of NPs and CNSs since 1996. Further, the data reveal that
while there is an overall shortage, the shortage varies widely by
geographic area with a national average
of 782 employed RNs per 100,000 population, but a range from 544
to 1,675.
A team of researchers
at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing recently released
survey data from the International Hospital and Outcomes Research
Consortium, 1998-99, that studied nursing in the United States,
Canada, England, Scotland and Germany (Health Affairs, May/June
2001). In every country except Germany, more than one-third of nurses
report dissatisfaction and score high on emotional exhaustion and
feeling overwhelmed by their work.
In the United
States, one-third of the
nurses surveyed younger than age 30 say they plan to leave in the
next year.
Although more than 80 percent of American nurses believe that physicians
provide high quality care, nurses are clinically competent and physicians
and nurses have good working relationships, more than one-third
believe that there are not enough RNs to provide high-quality care
or even get the work done.
The nurses in
this study report performing many non-nursing tasks while having
to leave undone important duties such as patient/family teaching
and comforting or talking with patients. They also report significant
verbal abuse from patients and families.
Another study,
"Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes in Hospitals" (http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/dn/staffstudy.htm),
was conducted for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
This nationwide research clearly documents strong, consistent relationships
between nurse staffing variables and outcomes.
In medical patients,
for example, higher
RN staffing was associated with a 3 percent to 12 percent reduction
in urinary tract infections, pneumonia, length of stay, upper gastrointestinal
bleeding and shock. Given the overall cost of these outcomes, a
reduction of this size can be quantified into multimillion dollar
savings (or additional expenditures if higher RN staffing does not
occur).
For nurses who
provide or have previously provided direct care, none of this research
is news. The beauty of nursing is that we often think with our hearts
and souls, but that also can be our weakness when we compete for
resources with people who must run businesses based on solid financial
information.
We have made
much progress in the last 10 years in having nurses move into executive
management positions so that someone who has been at the bedside
now can be in the boardroom. Research efforts like the aforementioned
provide all of us with the data to support what we have observed
and improve the odds that we, rather than others, can control the
destiny of nursing.
What
do you think?
Email us at
editor@nurseweek.com
|